Home Business Barrick under fire by UN for toxic spills at Argentina’s Veladero mine

Barrick under fire by UN for toxic spills at Argentina’s Veladero mine

17 min read
Comments Off on Barrick under fire by UN for toxic spills at Argentina’s Veladero mine
0
24


UN letters express concern about impacts on local population’s health and environment

Article content

Canadian miner Barrick Gold Corp. is once again under fire for its environmental track record and relationship with local communities in the Andes Mountains.

Advertisement 2

Article content

On Tuesday, the United Nations released letters that three advisors to its Human Rights Council — independent experts known as special rapporteurs — wrote in September to Toronto-based Barrick, the Canadian government and others, expressing concern about toxic spills from the Veladero mine in Argentina, which it owns jointly with China’s Shandong Gold Group.

Article content

Between 2015 and 2017, mercury and other contaminants were detected in the river system next to the mine, located at high elevation in northwestern Argentina, near the border with Chile. The mine, which uses heap leach processing in which ore is piled on a concrete pad and rinsed with cyanide to extract gold and silver, was linked to three spills and Barrick paid millions of dollars in fines.

Advertisement 3

Article content

Afterwards, the spills appeared to stop. But in June the Financial Post reported that members of nearby communities and local journalists leveled accusations of new spills of mercury and other heavy metals into local waters, in 2021 and 2022, citing data collected by scientists at a university in Mendoza.

The UN special rapporteurs’ letter to Barrick characterized the accusations as “sufficiently reliable” and expressed concern about the impacts on the local population’s health and to the environment.

“While we do not wish to prejudge the accuracy of these allegations, we wish to express our grave concern about the impact on human rights caused by spills of cyanide, arsenic, mercury and other hazardous substances from the Veladero mine,” the letter states. “The lack of effective response by your company exacerbates these impacts.”

Advertisement 4

Article content

It is signed by Marcos Orellana, a UN Special Rapporteur on human rights and hazardous substances and wastes; Fernanda Hopenhaym, chair-rapporteur of the Working Group on Human Rights and Transnational Corporations; and David Boyd, UN special rapporteur on human rights and the environment, who is also a professor at the University of British Columbia.

Barrick Gold Corp.'s gold, silver and copper mines in Argentina's Andes mountains in Veladero, San Juan.
Barrick Gold Corp.’s gold, silver and copper mines in Argentina’s Andes mountains in Veladero, San Juan. Photo by Diego Levy/Bloomberg News files

Letters were also sent to Shandong Gold, which purchased a 50 per cent stake in the mine in 2017 for US$960 million, to the Chinese government, and to the joint venture company, Minera Argentina Gold SRL, that operates the mine.

The UN releases letters 60 days after receipt but Barrick provided the Financial Post with a copy of its response, which denies nearly all the allegations.

Advertisement 5

Article content

The company said in its reply that it did not spill any contaminants into the environment in 2022, and added that the impacts of three historical spills were overstated because they “did not impact the environment or human rights.”

It added that mercury and other metals found in local waters “naturally occur in the region,” and noted that cyanide — which it uses to rinse ore — was not found in the water. The company also said it rejects accusations that it did not effectively communicate the previous spills to authorities and local communities.

Still, Saúl Zeballos, who lives in San José de Jáchal, a community of 21,000 about 200 kilometres downstream from the mine, said he blames Barrick for breaking its promises to protect the local water supply. He added the company has not met local expectations of providing jobs.

Advertisement 6

Article content

Zeballos said Barrick never alerted the community to the original spill in 2015, which he only heard about informally through connections in the community. Since then, everyone has been drinking bottled water, but continue to use the local water for cooking and washing despite concerns about the health impacts, especially for their children.

They need to leave and leave the area in the same condition as when they got here

Saúl Zeballos

“They need to stop polluting the area,” Zeballos said in an interview during which his comments were translated from Spanish by two translators provided by Earthworks and MiningWatch Canada. “They need to leave and leave the area in the same condition as when they got here.”

Barrick initially developed the Veladero mine in 2005. Within several years, it started building a second mine several kilometres away, straddling the Argentina-Chile border, known as Pascua-Lama. But in 2017, Chilean regulators ordered Barrick to halt all mining after finding adverse impacts on the environment.

Advertisement 7

Article content

Meanwhile, Argentina has passed legislation that says a mine that commits three environmental infractions can be forced to close.

The UN advisors’ letter to Barrick cites “information” it received from unnamed sources summarizing four spills linked to Veladero between 2015 and 2022:

  • in 2015, a valve broke, releasing millions of litres of water containing cyanide and other heavy metals into five rivers, resulting in a US$10 million fine;
  • in September 2016, ice damaged a pipe, and elevated levels of mercury were detected in the local river. Local government suspended mining operations, but mining resumed the next month;
  • in March 2017 another pipe ruptured. The company paid an additional $5.6 million in fines for the September and March spills, according to the letter;
  • this past June, a journalist in Argentina reported that scientists at the National University of Cuyo in Mendoza analyzed local water samples and found that the level of mercury, aluminum and manganese exceeded health standards set by the World Health Organization.

Advertisement 8

Article content

The letter to Barrick does not address whether any regulators or government officials in Argentina are taking any action at present. It says the impacts on local communities’ health were a serious concern; it also notes concern about the impact on the local environment, including the San Guillermo Biosphere Reserve.

“We are also concerned about the company’s failure to report these spills in a timely manner,” the letter states. “The lack of timely information hinders the adoption of protective measures for the populations exposed to toxic substances in the spills and the environment.”

(ESG) is skewed towards environmental concerns at the expense of social and governance

Mark Bristow

Last year, the mine produced 172,000 ounces of gold. In October 2021, Barrick announced it would create a trust fund for community development projects near the mine, financed by 1.5 per cent of all gold sales from Veladero.

Advertisement 9

Article content

Last week, on a third quarter earnings call with analysts, Barrick chief executive Mark Bristow said the company had recently built new pads for its heap leach operations and alluded to some difficulties.

“We are still getting our heads around the geomet and leach dynamics, which we believe have also been exacerbated by the abnormally long winter and freezing of part of the pads,” he said, without offering further details.

Repeating a message he has emphasized previously, Bristow also said on the call that he believes that ESG — the catch-all term to evaluate a company’s environmental, social and governance track record — “is skewed towards environmental concerns at the expense of social and governance.”

They’re completely destroying the water

Saúl Zeballos

His company is focused on investing in impoverished regions to help resolve local poverty, he said.

According to Barrick’s disclosures about payments to foreign governments, in 2021 the company paid US$170,000 in taxes in Argentina. In 2020, the company paid US$210,000 in taxes and US$12 million for infrastructure improvements in the country.

Zeballos, the resident of San Jose de Jachal, objected to the idea that Barrick was making a large economic difference in the community, saying the company’s environmental legacy would be pollution.

“They’re completely destroying the water,” he said through the translators.

• Email: gfriedman@postmedia.com | Twitter:

Advertisement

Comments

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.





Source link

Load More Related Articles
Load More By 
Load More In Business
Comments are closed.

Check Also

Qatar Joins TotalEnergies, Eni for Stake in Lebanon Gas Blocks

Article content (Bloomberg) — QatarEnergy signed an agreement with TotalEnergies SE and En…