Home Business Chip designers warm to U.S. bill despite big benefits to Intel

Chip designers warm to U.S. bill despite big benefits to Intel

10 min read
Comments Off on Chip designers warm to U.S. bill despite big benefits to Intel
0
46


Article content

Major U.S. chip firms on Monday were coming around to support a package of chip industry subsidies despite earlier concerns that legislation awaiting a vote in the Senate disproportionately benefits manufacturers like Intel Corp .

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has told lawmakers that a vote could come as early as Tuesday on a slimmed-down set of bills to bolster the U.S. computer chip industry, after Democratic lawmakers cleaved them from a larger, more contentious bill.

Advertisement 2

Article content

The bills are aimed at making the U.S. more competitive against a rising China, whose chip industry has grown rapidly over the last five years to account for almost 10% of global sales.

The measures include $52 billion in subsidies and an investment tax credit to boost U.S. manufacturing. The bills have bipartisan support. Powerful Republican Senator John Cornyn on Sunday tweeted https://twitter.com/JohnCornyn/status/1548745290546544640 that proceedings on the bill have a “green light” after Democrats pared back their ambitions for unrelated spending bills.

But a rift had emerged last week within the chip industry itself, with some players concerned the final language of the legislation would provide disproportionate support to manufacturers like Intel while doing little to support chip designers like Advanced Micro Devices Inc, Qualcomm Inc and Nvidia Corp.

Advertisement 3

Article content

Intel, along with firms like Texas Instruments and Micron Technology Inc, designs and manufacturers its own chips. Such firms would benefit from the $52 billion in CHIPS Act subsidies to build factories and also from an investment tax credit to purchase tools for use inside their factories from another measure called the FABS Act.

Intel earlier this year said it would spend $20 billion on a factory in Ohio after breaking ground on two new plants in Arizona last year.

AMD, Qualcomm and Nvidia design their own chips but tap partners to fabricate them and would see no direct benefit from subsidies to build plants or tax support for tools.

They support a separate version of the FABS Act introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives that contains both the manufacturing tax credit and a tax credit for chip design activities that would directly benefit them.

Advertisement 4

Article content

That version of the FABS Act – which is more pleasing to a broader swather of chip industry players – is also the one the Semiconductor Industry Association, which represents U.S. chip firms, had called on lawmakers to pass.

“We’re encouraged that the legislation is progressing, and we continue to support enactment of $52 billion in CHIPS Act investments and a FABS Act investment tax credit for both manufacturing and design,” the association said in a statement on Friday.

The current Senate legislation contains no design tax credit. An SIA spokesperson on Monday said the major chip design companies have told the association they do not plan to oppose the bill over the issue. An AMD spokesperson on Monday said the company supports the current legislation.

Advertisement 5

Article content

Nvidia declined to comment, and Qualcomm and Intel did not return requests for comment.

The lack of a chip design tax credit had prompted some U.S. companies, which asked not to be named for fear of industry and government blowback, to debate their support for the Senate bill if the final language that comes to the floor has no tax credit for design activities, two people familiar with matter said.

“You have Intel that might get $20 billion with CHIPS Act plus $5 billion or $10 billion under the FABS Act. So $30 billion goes to your direct competitor, and you don’t get a penny? That’s going to cause problems in the market,” said one person at a company that debated its position on the bill, speaking on condition of anonymity because the person was not authorized to talk to the press.

“It’s going to benefit just a few companies,” said a person at a second company that deliberated its support for a bill with no design credits who was not authorized to speak to the press. (Reporting by Stephen Nellis in San Francisco; Editing by Leslie Adler)

Advertisement

Comments

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.





Source link

Load More Related Articles
Load More By James Tisdale
Load More In Business
Comments are closed.

Check Also

New Details About Queen Elizabeth II’s Final Resting Place

Getty Images Queen Elizabeth II was interred at Windsor Castle on September 19, and now th…